o my lordy She doesn't have the power to stop the vote OR to change the forum rules. She made the staff aware of a vote in progress in which she SAID ought to be left up for a couple days. IMO - staff got a good cross-section of people voting. It was almost 2 to 1. Game over. I'm sorry you feel the way you do. Really. But I think that continuing a diatribe against Misn0mer isn't productive. It's caustic. If you want to blame anyone, I think the silly anon who posted the nasty comments IN THE VOTING probably sealed the deal. CAN SEE if those anon posts were a regular, a newbie or an old handle with a history of vicious posts. Besides, what's wrong with people being held accountable for what they say? I refer you to this: In a 2004 article in the journal CyberPsychology & Behavior, John Suler, a psychologist at Rider University in Lawrenceville, New Jersey, suggested that several psychological factors lead to online disinhibition: the anonymity of a Web pseudonym; invisibility to others; the time lag between sending an e- mail message and getting feedback; the exaggerated sense of self from being alone; and the lack of any online authority figure. The move to R+ gets rid of a couple of these factors. Thus, fewer trolls. If you want to post something anon then create a green handle to do just that. Already I can see who it is that has been dinging ME regularly. Now I know enough to ignore the person's comments and that those comments aren't coming from several people. AND it gets rid of the hateful GOD HATES FAGS type of post.