coffeen
|
 |
2011-11-29 21-04-37
|
|
great question! Oh geez, don’t get me started, lol… so many, so many, so many! The very definition of a FB, stands for all those things that I would never tolerate in a long term mate, to be quiet honest the only “mate” I could ever have full time (as in live together and all that) would have to be rather submissive or super duper independent and neutral. But that doesn’t turn me on the way the aggressors do… the very dominance, arrogance, cockiness that drives me nuts in bed, simply does not work when imposed on me in everyday life. Now I am exaggerating here, there are all flavours in between, take the guy I see now for example, he is way more than a FB but in essence is he really? We are not getting more committed because of (my own situational limitations first and foremost) but also because of much of his possessiveness, opinions on my choices, choice of clothes, friends, home, car, on and on an don… and what is “appropriate” behaviour for “his girl”. Another issue that I can live with in a FB but not a mate, is sexual trust. I trust him with my life and the lives of others (I really do), he is the most honorourable man I have ever encountered…. But when it comes to women, I don’t trust him as far as I can throw a dime! We don’t really run into these issues because we are FB, now FB to be clear, for me, doesn’t mean lack of depth, love, respect, intimacy, and vanilla company enjoyment… it is deep, known him for longer than i haven't... since i was x, it's as deep as I will go for quiet a while and possibly in some ways ever.
|